logabear.com

Category: Quick Reference

  • Flat Earth Middle Ages Myth: Why Medieval People Knew the Earth Was Round

    Flat Earth Middle Ages Myth: Why Medieval People Knew the Earth Was Round

    Ever had someone toss this one at you? “Back then, people thought you’d sail right off the edge!” Sounds dramatic. Makes for a great campfire tale. Too bad it’s pure fiction.

    Ask any medieval mapmaker or ship’s captain and they’d probably give you a look somewhere between confusion and pity. Of course the Earth was round. They’d been navigating its curves for centuries. The “flat Earth Middle Ages” is actually a myth cooked up much later, mostly in the 19th century, by people who wanted to make the past look foolish and their own era look brilliant.

    Flat Earth Middle Ages Myth: Why Medieval People Knew the Earth Was Round

    Related Reads:

    How We Got Stuck with This Story

    Picture a bunch of Victorian writers sitting around mahogany tables, the scratch of quill pens mixing with the clink of afternoon tea. Convinced they lived in the most enlightened age ever, naturally. Books like The Life and Voyages of Christopher Columbus (1828) and History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science (1874) started spinning tales about poor Columbus trying to convince stubborn scholars he wouldn’t tumble into the void.

    Here’s the twist: the real argument wasn’t about shape at all. Columbus thought the Earth was smaller than it actually was, meaning Asia would be closer than expected. The scholars who opposed him? They had a better grasp of the planet’s actual size. Columbus got lucky that America happened to be sitting where he thought Asia would be.

    What Medieval Folks Actually Knew header image: earth middle ages artwork

    What Medieval Folks Actually Knew

    Medieval scholars weren’t stumbling around in ignorance. They had solid evidence staring them in the face:

    Ships and horizons: Stand on a medieval dock long enough, breathing in the tar and brine, listening to the creak of rope against wood, and you’ll see it yourself. A ship’s hull vanishes first, its mast lingering like a matchstick before it too dips away. No magic. Just a round planet doing its thing. Every sailor knew this trick of perspective.

    During lunar eclipses, that curved shadow creeping across the moon’s face told the whole story. Medieval astronomers weren’t idiots. They could connect the dots. Round shadow, round Earth. (Sometimes the simplest observations are the most convincing.)

    Middle Ages artwork of earth

    Ancient math that actually worked: Some Greek guy named Eratosthenes had already nailed Earth’s circumference back in the 3rd century BCE, getting within shouting distance of the real number. Medieval universities didn’t just forget this stuff, they taught it.

    These weren’t fringe ideas whispered in dark corners. University students learned about spherical Earth. Islamic scholars preserved and expanded on the knowledge. Medieval artists painted the world as a globe. The evidence was everywhere if you bothered to look.

    Why This Myth Just Won’t Die

    Part of the myth’s staying power? It scratches that itch we have to believe we’re smarter than everyone who came before us. There’s something satisfying about imagining our ancestors as bumbling fools who thought ships would plummet into space.

    Plus, “flat Earth” is visual catnip. It’s easier to picture than the messy reality of medieval scholarship, which involved actual math and careful observation and international exchange of ideas. Boring! Much better to imagine trembling sailors afraid of sea monsters at the world’s edge.

    Middle Ages ship at sea abstract art

    The Real Story Behind the Story

    Myths about science aren’t just wrong facts! They’re stories we tell ourselves about who we are. The flat Earth myth says more about 19th-century writers and their need to feel superior than it does about actual medieval beliefs.

    When we dig into why certain “historical facts” stick around, we usually find they’re serving some purpose in the present. Sometimes the most persistent lies are just really good stories that make us feel better about ourselves.

    So if someone insists medieval sailors feared “falling off the edge,” you can smile, sip your coffee, and know the real punchline. The only edge they worried about was the one on their sword.

    Sources

  • Thinking Clearly in a Messy World: Why Critical Thinking Still Matters

    Thinking Clearly in a Messy World: Why Critical Thinking Still Matters

    Ever feel like your brain’s getting bombarded with too much information, and not all of it makes sense? You’re not alone. These days, everyone’s wading through a nonstop flood of opinions, facts, and half-truths. The tool that helps you stay afloat. Critical thinking. It’s not fancy or flashy, but it’s what helps you cut through the noise.

    So, what exactly is critical thinking? It’s not about being a skeptic all the time, and it’s definitely not about knowing every fact under the sun. Thinking clearly and critically is more about how you think, how you question, evaluate, and make decisions based on reason instead of impulse. It’s the difference between accepting what someone tells you and actually examining whether it makes sense.

    Why bother? Because in a world where misinformation spreads faster than facts, critical thinking gives you the tools to make better decisions, solve problems more effectively, and spot BS from a mile away. Basically, it helps you become a more informed, resilient person in this bewildering 21st century.

    Analyze the information Evaluate the data and separate fact from opinion - critical thinking infographic

    The Essential Skills: What Critical Thinkers Actually Do

    Here’s what critical thinking looks like in practice:

    Ask Better Questions: Don’t just absorb information. Interrogate it. Ask “why?”, “how do you know?”, and “says who?” Look for evidence. Demand justification. Think about that time you read a headline that turned out to be totally misleading when you dug deeper.

    Think Like a Detective: Break down complex information piece by piece. Identify the main claims, trace them back to their sources, and check if those sources are reliable. A peer-reviewed study carries more weight than a random tweet, but even studies deserve scrutiny.

    Avoid Mental Traps: Use logic to spot inconsistencies and sidestep common thinking mistakes, like jumping to conclusions or assuming correlation means causation.

    See Other Viewpoints: Be genuinely open to considering perspectives that differ from your own, even ones that challenge beliefs you hold dear. Others might have valid points, even if you disagree with them.

    Work Through Problems, Not Around Them: Use logic and reasoning to break problems into smaller parts, weigh pros and cons, and pick the best solution from your options.

    Check Yourself (Seriously): Examine your own assumptions and biases. We all have them. Critical thinking means being self-aware enough to recognize when your own perspective might be limited or wrong.

    Where This All Started: A Quick History

    Socrates and the Power of Questions Socrates didn’t give people answers. He asked questions. A lot of them. And he expected good answers in return. That’s the root of critical thinking: don’t just accept something because someone said it. His famous method of questioning claims without solid reasoning basically immortalized the phrase “prove it.”

    The Renaissance: Shaking Things Up This era was all about challenging the status quo. Thinkers like Thomas More questioned everything from religion to politics. Later, Francis Bacon and René Descartes pushed for more systematic, rigorous thinking. Their message? Question everything, even yourself.

    From Philosophy to Everyday Skill John Dewey helped bring critical thinking into education, emphasizing that you need actual knowledge as a foundation for good reasoning. Without knowing stuff, critical thinking becomes an empty exercise. It was around this time that critical thinking moved from being a purely philosophical concept to something schools and employers actively wanted.

    Harnessing Your Brain Power - critical thinking infographic

    Critical Thinking Today: Wanted But Endangered

    Everyone Wants It Universities and employers constantly talk about how important critical thinking is. “Analytical thinking” consistently ranks as one of the most sought-after skills globally, beating out even technical know-how.

    But We’re Drowning in Bad Info Our digital world is a minefield of questionable data. Social media rewards hot takes, not thoughtful ones. Emotional posts spread faster than fact-checked ones. In this environment, critical thinking is your best defense against getting swept up in misinformation.

    Schools Aren’t Really Teaching It Here’s the weird part: even though everyone says critical thinking is crucial, a lot of teachers never actually learned how to teach it. Traditional lectures and memorization still dominate many classrooms. We’re still telling students what to think instead of how to think.

    Public Discourse Is a Mess Social media echo chambers, tribal thinking, and the speed at which false information spreads all work against rational discussion. Critical thinking is fighting an uphill battle in the attention economy.

    The Ongoing Debates

    Despite all the hype, there’s still plenty of disagreement about critical thinking:

    What Is It, Really? There’s no single agreed-upon definition. Is it a general skill that works everywhere, or does it change depending on whether you’re doing science versus analyzing literature?

    Knowledge vs. Process Do you need to know a lot of facts before you can think critically? Or can you learn the thinking process first? Most experts say you need both. It’s hard to think critically about something you know nothing about.

    The Teacher Problem Even though we know critical thinking matters, plenty of educators never really learn how to teach it. That’s a big part of why students graduate without these skills.

    Can You Be Too Critical? Some argue that excessive criticism can actually hurt understanding or make people overly cynical. Where’s the line between healthy skepticism and destructive doubt?

    It’s Uncomfortable Let’s be honest, questioning your own beliefs is hard. Our egos resist challenges to our sense of being “right.” That’s part of why critical thinking doesn’t come naturally to most of us.

    Brain Power Boost - critical thinking infographic

    The Future: AI, Algorithms, and Human Brains

    AI presents both opportunities and challenges for critical thinking:

    The Risks As AI gets better at routine reasoning tasks, we might become lazy and let machines do our thinking for us. Plus, AI systems aren’t neutral. They can reflect the biases of their creators or perpetuate existing inequalities.

    What Humans Still Do Best AI can process information faster than we can, but humans excel at ethical judgment, creative thinking, and seeing connections across different fields. These uniquely human abilities will become more valuable, not less.

    Staying Sharp We need to learn how to work with AI without becoming dependent on it. That means staying curious, asking good questions, and maintaining our ability to think independently.

    Critical thinking will be essential for navigating an increasingly complex information landscape. It’s our best tool for distinguishing reliable information from manipulation and making good decisions in a world where the stakes keep getting higher.

    Start Where You Are

    You don’t need to be a philosopher to think critically, just curious, honest, and willing to slow down and really consider things. Start small. Question something today. Check a source. Ask “how do they know that?” Consider a viewpoint you usually dismiss.

    Your brain is incredibly powerful, but like any tool, it works better when you know how to use it well. In a world full of noise, clear thinking isn’t just helpful, it’s essential!

    Sources

  • Master the Scientific Method: Crush Misinformation Fast!

    Master the Scientific Method: Crush Misinformation Fast!

    Ever wonder why some health claims sound convincing but turn out to be complete nonsense? Or how scientists can be so confident about things like vaccines and climate change? The secret isn’t some mystical scientific intuition—it’s a tried-and-true process called the scientific method.

    And honestly? Once you understand how it works, you’ll become way better at spotting BS in your daily life.

    What Exactly Is the Scientific Method?

    Think of the scientific method as a recipe for discovering truth. Just like following a recipe helps you bake a decent cake (instead of creating a kitchen disaster), following the scientific method helps researchers find reliable answers instead of just confirming what they want to believe.

    The beauty of this process is that it forces you to question your assumptions, test your ideas fairly, and follow the evidence wherever it leads—even when it’s not where you expected to go.

    Why Should You Care?

    Here’s the thing: we’re all bombarded with “scientific” claims every day. Your Facebook feed probably has at least three posts right now claiming that some superfood will change your life or that scientists have “proven” something shocking.

    But here’s what most people don’t realize—real science doesn’t work in dramatic headlines and miracle breakthroughs. It works through careful, methodical investigation. When you understand this process, you can spot the difference between legitimate research and clever marketing disguised as science.

    The Six Steps That Change Everything

    The scientific method isn’t complicated, but it is thorough. Let me walk you through each step, and then you can try it yourself with our interactive simulator below.

    1. Observation

    Everything starts with noticing something interesting. Maybe you observe that your friend who drinks green tea never seems to get sick, or you notice that plants in certain parts of your garden grow differently.

    Real science begins with genuine curiosity, not with trying to prove a point you already believe.

    2. Research Question

    This is where many people go wrong. Good science asks specific, measurable questions. “Does green tea boost immunity?” is okay, but “Does drinking 2 cups of green tea daily reduce cold symptoms in adults?” is much better.

    The more specific your question, the more useful your answer will be.

    3. Hypothesis

    A hypothesis isn’t just a guess—it’s an educated prediction that you can actually test. It should have two parts: what you think will happen, and under what specific conditions.

    Good hypotheses are like promises you make to the universe: “If I do X under these exact conditions, then Y will happen.”

    4. Experiment Design

    This is where the rubber meets the road. How will you test your hypothesis fairly? You need control groups, large enough sample sizes, and ways to measure your results objectively.

    The goal is to design a test so fair that even if you’re wrong, the results will convince you.

    5. Data Collection

    Run your experiment and collect the data—all of it, not just the parts that support what you hoped would happen. Real scientists are obsessed with accuracy, not with being right.

    6. Analysis and Conclusion

    What does your data actually show? Sometimes the answer is “my hypothesis was wrong,” and that’s completely fine. Wrong hypotheses teach us just as much as right ones.

    Good scientists follow the data, not their egos.

    Try It Yourself: Interactive Scientific Method Simulator

    Ready to see how this works in practice? I’ve created an interactive simulator where you can walk through real scientific investigations step by step. You’ll make the same kinds of decisions that researchers face, see actual experimental results, and learn why some approaches work better than others.

    The simulator lets you choose from three different scenarios—investigating plant growth, memory and music, or hand washing effectiveness. Each one teaches you something different about how good science works.

    What I love about this simulator is that it shows you something crucial: science often gives us surprising results. The best scientific thinking happens when we let the data guide our conclusions, not the other way around.

    The Real-World Payoff

    Once you've played with the simulator and understand how the scientific method works, you'll start noticing things:

    That article claiming "scientists prove coffee cures cancer" based on one small study? You'll recognize that single studies don't "prove" anything, especially with dramatic claims.

    The supplement company citing a "clinical trial" with 12 participants? You'll know that's nowhere near a large enough sample size to draw reliable conclusions.

    The social media post about how "Big Pharma doesn't want you to know" about some natural cure? You'll understand that good scientific discoveries get replicated and published, not hidden.

    Why Scientists Are Actually Pretty Humble

    Here's something that might surprise you: real scientists are incredibly cautious about their claims. They use words like "suggests," "indicates," and "may contribute to" because they understand the limitations of their work.

    When you see someone making absolute claims based on science—"this PROVES that" or "scientists have DISCOVERED the secret to," that's usually a red flag. Good science builds knowledge gradually, not through dramatic revelations.

    The Bottom Line

    The scientific method isn't perfect, but it's the best tool we have for understanding our world reliably. It's self-correcting, transparent, and designed to minimize bias and error.

    More importantly for your daily life, understanding this process helps you navigate our information-saturated world with confidence. You'll know which health claims to take seriously, which news stories to dig deeper on, and which "scientific" marketing claims to ignore.

    Science isn't about blind trust in authority—it's about having a reliable process for figuring out what's actually true. And now you know how that process works.

    Want to dive deeper into spotting science misinformation? Check out our complete guide to detecting BS science claims. And if you found a piece of questionable "science" in the wild, comment below—we love a good fact-checking challenge!

    Sources:

    • Gerde, H.K., Schachter, R.E. & Wasik, B.A. Using the Scientific Method to Guide Learning: An Integrated Approach to Early Childhood Curriculum. Early Childhood Educ J 41, 315–323 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0579-4

  • How to Spot Science Misinformation: Your BS Detector Guide

    How to Spot Science Misinformation: Your BS Detector Guide

    You see it everywhere: “Scientists HATE this one weird trick!” or “New study PROVES everything you know about [insert topic] is WRONG!”

    But here’s the thing—I used to fall for this stuff all the time.

    I remember sharing an article about how microwaves “destroy food nutrients” without even checking if it was true. My mom called me out on it. Embarrassing? Absolutely. But it taught me something valuable: we all need better BS detectors.

    So how do you separate legitimate science news from complete nonsense? You don’t need a PhD, just some healthy skepticism and a few tricks I’ve learned the hard way.

    The Clickbait Circus

    What screams “fake news”:

    • ALL CAPS and excessive exclamation points
    • Words like “BREAKTHROUGH,” “MIRACLE,” “SHOCKING,” “SCIENTISTS DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW”
    • Claims that one study “proves” or “disproves” everything we know

    Real science doesn’t work like that. It’s more like… well, imagine trying to solve a 10,000-piece puzzle. You don’t suddenly find the one piece that makes the whole picture clear. You build it slowly, piece by piece.

    Research shows that classic clickbait headlines often use hyperbolic and formulaic language to create information gaps that arouse curiosity, and more than half of misinformation experts agree that misleading but not outright false content counts as misinformation.

    Legitimate researchers use careful language: “suggests,” “indicates,” “may contribute to.” If someone claims one study overturns decades of research? Yeah, that’s your first red flag.

    Quick example: “SHOCKING: Coffee PROVEN to cure cancer!” vs. “Study suggests coffee consumption may be linked to reduced risk of certain cancers.”

    See the difference? One sounds like a carnival barker. The other sounds like, you know, actual science.

    The Vanishing Source Trick

    Here’s where things get sneaky. You’ll see claims like “studies show…” but when you go hunting for the actual study? Good luck.

    I’ve spent way too many evenings going down rabbit holes, clicking link after link, only to find they all lead back to the same blog post from 2003. No actual research in sight.

    Red flags to watch for:

    • Vague references to “European scientists” or “a major university”
    • Links that lead to other blog posts instead of real research
    • Sources that mysteriously don’t exist when you search for them

    Your move: Can you actually find the study? Is it published somewhere legit? If you can’t trace the claim back to real research, treat it like that suspicious sushi at the gas station—probably best to pass.

    Cherry-Picking Season (It’s Year-Round)

    Oh, this one drives me nuts. It’s like judging a restaurant based on one Yelp review while ignoring the other 847 reviews.

    Cherry-picking happens when people intentionally or unintentionally select evidence that fits their narrative while ignoring contradictory data. Science misinformation loves to grab one small, preliminary study and parade it around like it’s the final word. Meanwhile, there might be dozens of larger, better studies saying the complete opposite.

    Here in Norfolk, we know something about weather patterns, right? You wouldn’t declare it’s always sunny here based on one nice day in February. Same logic applies to science.

    Take the bias detection training quiz!

    What to watch for:

    • Focusing on tiny studies while ignoring larger ones
    • Taking quotes completely out of context
    • Conveniently forgetting to mention study limitations

    Reality check: Science works through consensus. Research shows that disagreements across data sources can actually drive different conclusions about intervention efficacy, which is why looking at multiple studies together matters more than any single finding.

    The Fake Expert Problem

    This might be my biggest pet peeve. Just because someone has “Dr.” in front of their name doesn’t mean they know what they’re talking about outside their field.

    I once saw a dentist giving definitive advice about climate change. Now, I trust my dentist with my teeth, but atmospheric science? Not so much.

    Watch out for:

    • Doctors commenting way outside their expertise
    • Credentials from institutions you’ve never heard of (and Google hasn’t either)
    • Experts with obvious financial conflicts they don’t mention

    Quick check: Does this person actually research this topic? A simple Google Scholar search can tell you if they publish real work in the field. It takes two minutes and can save you from sharing nonsense.

    Conspiracy Brain

    Look, I get it. Sometimes it feels like powerful interests are hiding things from us. And occasionally, they are! But when someone claims that thousands of scientists worldwide are all in on some massive cover-up… come on.

    Scientists are competitive. They love proving each other wrong. If there were easy ways to cure cancer or disprove climate change, researchers would be fighting to publish those findings, not covering them up. That’s how careers are made.

    Red flags:

    • Claims about widespread cover-ups by scientists
    • “They don’t want you to know” language
    • Dismissing all mainstream science as propaganda

    Reality check: Science thrives on disagreement and new discoveries. The conspiracy would have to be impossibly huge and involve people who actually hate each other professionally.

    What Actually Looks Legit?

    After years of getting fooled (more than I’d like to admit), here’s what I look for now:

    • Multiple studies from different research groups reaching similar conclusions
    • Authors who admit what they don’t know and acknowledge limitations
    • Clear information about who funded the research
    • Careful, measured language about findings
    • Links to actual research papers, not just press releases

    It’s not as exciting as “SCIENTISTS DISCOVER ONE WEIRD TRICK,” but it’s how real knowledge gets built.

    My Personal BS Detection Routine

    Before I share anything science-related now, I ask myself:

    1. Who published this, and do they have a good track record?
    2. What are the author’s actual qualifications in this specific area?
    3. Can I find the original study, and does it actually say what this article claims?
    4. Does this contradict what most experts in the field believe? If so, why?
    5. Who benefits if I believe this information?

    Honestly? I still mess up sometimes. Nobody gets it right every time. But I’m getting better at catching the obvious fakes.

    When You’re Not Sure, Just Wait

    Here’s something I’ve learned: real scientific breakthroughs don’t disappear overnight. If something is truly important, you’ll hear about it from multiple legitimate sources over weeks or months, not just in one viral Facebook post.

    It’s okay to wait. It’s okay to say “I don’t know yet.” That’s actually pretty scientific thinking.

    The Bottom Line

    Science misinformation exploits our desire for simple answers and dramatic stories. But real science is messier than that. It’s uncertain, constantly evolving, and rarely gives us the clear-cut answers we want.

    The best defense isn’t blind trust—it’s learning to ask better questions and being okay with complexity.

    Remember: falling for misinformation doesn’t make you dumb. It makes you human. We all want to understand our world better. The trick is getting better at telling the real explanations from the fake ones.

    Sources:

    Got a piece of science misinformation you’d like us to investigate? Comment below—we love a good fact-checking challenge, and honestly, reader suggestions often lead to our best posts.

  • Current List of Science Apps

    Explore a collection of interactive math and science apps designed to make abstract concepts more intuitive. From spirograph visualizations to lessons on bias, correlation, and sample size, these tools are built for hands-on learning and exploration.